Photo of Andrew Siegel

Andrew Siegel

Andrew Siegel defends clients in FTC, DOJ, and State AG consumer protection investigations and enforcement actions, including against allegations relating to advertising and marketing practices, subscription autorenewals, and unfair and deceptive trade practices.

Andrew has extensive experience representing clients across industries, including in the technology, consumer products, and financial services sectors, in high-stakes government investigations by federal and state regulators. He defends clients against allegations relating to the marketing of online subscriptions, the use of algorithms and artificial intelligence, undisclosed endorsements, claim substantiation, and other unfair and deceptive practices. He also counsels clients on proactive compliance with FTC and state regulations governing consumer interactions.

In addition, Andrew advises clients on the protection of customer information and other sensitive data as they respond to demands from U.S. and international law enforcement agencies and government regulators, as well as private plaintiffs. Andrew assists clients in navigating U.S. and international data privacy requirements as they respond to federal grand jury subpoenas, international legal demands, and discovery requests.

On May 11, 2026, the Department of Justice, acting on notification from the Federal Trade Commission, and the Illinois Attorney General, filed a complaint against “Premium Home Service” and its owner for alleged violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, the Consumer Reviews Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB

Continue Reading FTC and DOJ Continue Focus on Consumer Reviews Rule with Complaint Against Premium Home Service

On May 13, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that Shutterstock, Inc. had agreed to a $35 million settlement resolving allegations that the company engaged in unfair and deceptive subscription practices. The FTC asserted claims under Section 5 of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act

Continue Reading FTC Settles with Shutterstock Over Subscription Practices

Autorenewal regulation has been a recent focus of both federal and state regulators. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently vacated the FTC’s Negative Option Rule on procedural grounds, but businesses need to remain vigilant of state regulatory requirements, including new ones that will take effect

Continue Reading States Press Forward with Automatic Renewal Laws Amidst Vacating of the FTC’s Negative Option Rule

In July, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that telemedicine company NextMed agreed to pay $150,000 to settle charges that it deceptively advertised its GLP-1 weight-loss membership programs to consumers. The FTC’s complaint alleged a host of deceptive practices under Sections 5 and 12 of the FTC Act, including making

Continue Reading FTC Targets Weight-Loss Membership Program

On July 8, 2025, the Eighth Circuit issued a per curiam decision that vacated the FTC’s revised Negative Option Rule in its entirety.  The opinion will become effective when the court issues its mandate, which should happen within seven weeks unless the FTC seeks further review.

The Negative Option Rule

Continue Reading Eighth Circuit Vacates FTC Negative Option Rule

In September, FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson called for the FTC to regulate artificial intelligence claims through its existing consumer protection authorities:  “Imposing comprehensive regulations at the incipiency of a potential technological revolution would be foolish.  For now, we should limit ourselves to enforcing existing laws against illegal conduct when it

Continue Reading FTC Challenges Deceptive Artificial Intelligence Claims